Jira vs Teamwork: The Complete 2026 Comparison

Choosing between Jira and Teamwork for project management? This in-depth comparison breaks down pricing, features, user ratings, integrations, and real-world use cases to help you make the right decision. Both tools serve the project management category, but they take distinctly different approaches to helping teams get work done.

Founded in 2002, Jira is Atlassian's flagship project management and issue tracking tool, dominant in software development. Meanwhile, Teamwork was founded in 2007. Teamwork is a project management platform built for client work and agencies. Let us dive into how they stack up across every dimension that matters.

Quick Verdict

Teamwork edges ahead with a G2 rating of 4.4/5 (based on 1,100 reviews) versus Jira's 4.3/5 (6,100 reviews). However, Jira holds its own with 12 key features and competitive pricing starting at Free (up to 10 users). If budget is your top priority, Teamwork ($5.99/user/month at the pro tier) is the more affordable option.

At-a-Glance: Jira vs Teamwork

Before we dive into the details, here is a high-level overview of how Jira and Teamwork compare across the key criteria most teams care about when evaluating project management software.

Criteria Jira Teamwork
G2 Rating 4.3/5 (6,100 reviews) 4.4/5 (1,100 reviews)
Free Plan Free (up to 10 users) Free (up to 5 users)
Pro Pricing $7.75/user/month $5.99/user/month
Enterprise $15.25/user/month $9.99/user/month
Founded 2002 2007
Key Features 12 features 12 features
Integrations 10+ integrations 10+ integrations
Category Project Management Project Management
Website www.atlassian.com/software/jira www.teamwork.com

About Jira

Jira is Atlassian's flagship project management and issue tracking tool, dominant in software development. It offers deep customization, powerful workflows, and extensive Marketplace integrations. Founded in 2002, Jira has built a reputation in the project management space, earning a 4.3/5 rating on G2 from 6,100 verified user reviews. The platform offers 12 distinct features and integrates with 10+ third-party tools.

Jira's core strengths include Scrum boards, Kanban boards, Backlog management, Sprints, Roadmaps. Teams that choose Jira typically value its approach to Scrum boards and Kanban boards, which sets it apart in the crowded project management landscape.

About Teamwork

Teamwork is a project management platform built for client work and agencies. It offers built-in time tracking, budgeting, and invoicing alongside standard project management features. Since its founding in 2007, Teamwork has grown to serve teams worldwide, achieving a 4.4/5 G2 rating from 1,100 reviews. The platform provides 12 key features and supports 10+ integrations.

Teamwork's standout capabilities include Task management, Time tracking, Milestones, Gantt charts, Workload management. Teams gravitating toward Teamwork often prioritize Task management and Time tracking, making it a strong fit for organizations that need these specific capabilities.

Pricing Breakdown: Jira vs Teamwork

Pricing is often the deciding factor when choosing project management software. Here is how Jira and Teamwork stack up across their pricing tiers. Note that both tools may offer annual billing discounts, and prices shown are for monthly billing as of 2026.

Plan Jira Teamwork
Starter / Free Free (up to 10 users) Free (up to 5 users)
Pro / Business $7.75/user/month $5.99/user/month
Enterprise $15.25/user/month $9.99/user/month

Pricing verdict: Teamwork is the more budget-friendly option at the pro tier, costing $5.99/user/month compared to $7.75/user/month for Jira. However, pricing alone should not drive your decision -- consider the total value each platform delivers relative to its cost. A tool that costs more but saves your team hours each week may actually be the more economical choice in the long run.

Keep in mind that both tools offer free plans or trials, so you can test each platform before committing. For teams of 10 or fewer, both Jira and Teamwork provide functional free tiers that let you evaluate the core experience without spending anything.

Feature Comparison: Jira vs Teamwork

Feature availability can make or break your team's productivity. Below is a detailed comparison of every feature offered by either Jira or Teamwork. This checklist covers 23 features across both platforms, giving you a comprehensive view of what each tool brings to the table.

Feature Jira Teamwork
Advanced search (JQL) Yes No
Automations Yes Yes
Backlog management Yes No
Board view No Yes
Budgeting No Yes
Components Yes No
Custom workflows Yes No
Gantt charts No Yes
Intake forms No Yes
Invoicing No Yes
Issue types Yes No
Kanban boards Yes No
Milestones No Yes
Portfolio management No Yes
Reports and dashboards Yes No
Risk register No Yes
Roadmaps Yes No
Scrum boards Yes No
Sprints Yes No
Task management No Yes
Time tracking No Yes
Versions and releases Yes No
Workload management No Yes

Jira offers 12 features while Teamwork provides 12. The features unique to Jira include Scrum boards, Kanban boards, Backlog management. Teamwork's unique features include Task management, Time tracking, Milestones.

Integrations: Jira vs Teamwork

In today's software landscape, no tool exists in isolation. The integrations a project management tool supports determine how well it fits into your existing tech stack. Here is how Jira and Teamwork compare in terms of third-party integrations.

Shared integrations (3): Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zapier. Both tools connect to these popular platforms, so if these are your critical integrations, neither tool has an advantage.

Unique to Jira: Confluence, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Trello, Figma, Miro.

Unique to Teamwork: HubSpot, QuickBooks, Google Drive, Dropbox, Harvest, Xero, Pabbly Connect.

Both platforms support Zapier or similar automation tools, which means you can build custom integrations even if a native connection is not available. When evaluating integrations, focus on the ones your team uses daily rather than the total count.

User Ratings and Community Sentiment

Real user reviews provide invaluable insight beyond feature lists. Here is how the community has rated Jira and Teamwork on G2, one of the most trusted software review platforms.

Metric Jira Teamwork
G2 Rating 4.3/5 4.4/5
Total Reviews 6,100 1,100
Years on Market 24 years (since 2002) 19 years (since 2007)

Teamwork leads with a 4.4/5 G2 rating compared to Jira's 4.3/5. The 0.1-point gap is meaningful given that both tools have thousands of reviews. Teamwork's rating is based on 1,100 reviews, providing strong statistical confidence in the score.

Which Tool Should You Pick? Use-Case Verdicts

The best project management tool is not universal -- it depends on your team size, budget, workflow requirements, and existing tech stack. Here are our recommendations for three common scenarios that cover most teams evaluating Jira and Teamwork.

Scenario 1: Small Teams and Startups (Under 20 People)

For small teams on a budget, Teamwork offers a more affordable entry point with its Free (up to 5 users) free tier. Teamwork may be easier to adopt quickly due to its more focused feature set, reducing onboarding time. However, Jira offers more room to grow as your team scales, with 12 features compared to 12.

Our pick: Teamwork -- Faster setup and lower complexity for small teams.

Scenario 2: Mid-Size Companies (20-200 People)

Mid-size teams need robust project management with good reporting and integrations. Jira offers integrations with Confluence, Bitbucket, Slack, Microsoft Teams, while Teamwork connects to Slack, Microsoft Teams, HubSpot, QuickBooks. For cross-functional teams, Jira provides stronger customization options. Both tools handle enterprise-grade workloads, but the Teamwork's higher G2 rating (4.4/5 from 1,100 reviews) suggests better overall satisfaction at scale.

Our pick: Teamwork -- Higher G2 rating (4.4/5) and stronger user satisfaction.

Scenario 3: Enterprise and Software Development Teams

At the enterprise level, integration depth, security, and workflow customization matter most. Jira's enterprise plan ($15.25/user/month) comes at a premium compared to Teamwork ($9.99/user/month). For development teams specifically, look at Git integrations: Jira integrates with GitHub . Jira includes sprint/scrum support.

Our pick: Jira -- More extensive user base providing better community support and proven reliability.

Final Recommendation: Jira vs Teamwork

After analyzing pricing, features, ratings, integrations, and real-world use cases, here is our bottom line on the Jira vs Teamwork decision.

Choose Jira if: You want Scrum boards, Kanban boards, Backlog management, and your team values a focused tool that does fewer things well. Jira's Free (up to 10 users) entry point makes it accessible to try, and its 10+ integrations ensure it fits into most tech stacks. With 24 years on the market, Jira is the more established option.

Choose Teamwork if: You prioritize Task management, Time tracking, Milestones, and your team needs a streamlined tool without unnecessary complexity. At $5.99/user/month per user per month (pro tier), Teamwork is the more affordable option. Though founded more recently in 2007, Teamwork has quickly built a strong reputation.

Whichever tool you choose, we recommend starting with the free plan or trial to evaluate how it works with your specific team's workflow. Run a two-week pilot with a small project before making a company-wide commitment. The right project management tool is the one your team will actually use consistently -- and that can only be determined through hands-on experience.

Switching Between Jira and Teamwork

If you are currently using one tool and considering switching to the other, here are some tips to make the migration smoother. Most project management tools support data export in CSV or JSON formats, and both Jira and Teamwork offer import functionality.

Start by exporting your current projects, tasks, and custom fields. Map your existing workflow to the new tool's structure before migrating data. Plan for a 2-4 week transition period where both tools run in parallel, and designate team champions to help with adoption. Consider using a third-party migration service if you have complex data structures or a large number of projects to transfer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jira better than Teamwork?

Teamwork has a higher G2 rating (4.4/5 vs 4.3/5 from 1,100 reviews), but the best tool depends on your needs. Jira stands out for Scrum boards, Kanban boards, Backlog management, while Teamwork excels at Task management, Time tracking, Milestones.

How much does Jira cost compared to Teamwork?

Jira's pro plan costs $7.75/user/month while Teamwork's pro plan costs $5.99/user/month. Jira starts at Free (up to 10 users) and Teamwork starts at Free (up to 5 users). Enterprise pricing is $15.25/user/month for Jira and $9.99/user/month for Teamwork.

Can Jira and Teamwork integrate with each other?

While direct integration varies, both Jira and Teamwork connect to common platforms including Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zapier. Third-party tools like Zapier can bridge any gaps between the two.

Which tool is easier to learn, Jira or Teamwork?

Jira (founded 2002) and Teamwork (founded 2007) take different approaches to usability. Jira generally has a simpler learning curve with fewer features to master, while Teamwork offers more features but may take longer to fully adopt.

What are the main differences between Jira and Teamwork?

The key differences are: (1) Pricing -- Jira starts at Free (up to 10 users) vs Teamwork at Free (up to 5 users). (2) G2 ratings -- Jira has 4.3/5 vs Teamwork at 4.4/5. (3) Features -- Jira focuses on Scrum boards, Kanban boards, Backlog management, while Teamwork emphasizes Task management, Time tracking, Milestones. (4) Founded -- Jira (2002) vs Teamwork (2007).

How We Compared Jira and Teamwork

This comparison is based on publicly available data including G2 user ratings and review counts, official pricing pages, published feature lists, and integration directories. Ratings and pricing data are approximate and were last verified in 2026. We encourage readers to check each tool's official website for the most current information, as pricing and features may change.

Our analysis covers pricing (free, pro, and enterprise tiers), features (23 features compared), integrations (20 total across both tools), user ratings (combined 7,200 G2 reviews), and use-case suitability (small teams, mid-size companies, and enterprises). We aim to provide objective, data-driven comparisons to help you make informed decisions.

Still not sure which tool is right for you?

Take our 60-second quiz and get a personalized recommendation based on your team size, budget, and must-have features.

Find Your Perfect Tool